You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.

Overall survival is more than double at 5 years with VYXEOS (18%) vs 7+3 (8%) based on KM estimates1,2

Median overall survival (primary analysis) of 9.6 months with VYXEOS vs 5.9 months with 7+3, reducing the risk of death by 31% (HR=0.69 [95% CI: 0.52, 0.90], P=0.005a)1

5-Year Follow-Up

Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival, ITT population2

VYXEOS overall survival KM curve
1-Year KM-estimated overall survival3
VYXEOS: 42% 7+3: 28%
5-Year KM-estimated overall survival2
VYXEOS: 18% 7+3: 8%

This prospectively planned overall survival analysis of the ITT population was conducted based on the final 5-year follow-up results from the Phase 3 trial2

 

Exploratory post hoc analysis

At 5 years, median overall survival was longer with VYXEOS vs 7+3 in patients aged 60-69 and 70-75 years2

5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival by age subgroup, aged 60 to 69 years4

KM Curve: 60-69 years

Median overall survival (95% CI):

VYXEOS: 9.6 months (6.0, 12.6) (n=76/96)

7+3: 6.9 months (4.6, 8.8) (n=91/102)

Age was prospectively stratified in the initial analysis of the Phase 3 trial2

See full study design

See the Phase 3 Study Safety Profile

Limitations of subanalysis

  • This exploratory post hoc subgroup analysis was not powered to determine statistical significance. No efficacy conclusions about OS can be drawn from this analysis

5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival by age subgroup, aged 70 to 75 years4

KM Curve: 70-75 years

Median overall survival (95% CI):

VYXEOS: 8.9 months (4.7, 12.2) (n=48/57)

7+3: 5.6 months (3.3, 7.5) (n=54/54)

Age was prospectively stratified in the initial analysis of the Phase 3 trial2

See full study design

See the Phase 3 Study Safety Profile

Limitations of subanalysis

  • This exploratory post hoc subgroup analysis was not powered to determine statistical significance. No efficacy conclusions about OS can be drawn from this analysis
 

Strive for higher remission rates in sAML with VYXEOS1,3

In the Phase 3 trial, almost half of sAML patients treated with VYXEOS achieved CR+CRi3

Percentage of sAML patients who achieved CR and CR+CRi1,3

 
 
 
 

Exploratory post hoc analysis

At 5 years, median overall survival was longer in patients who achieved CR or CRi with VYXEOS vs 7+34

5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival in patients who achieved CR or CRi4

KM Curve

Median overall survival (95% CI):

VYXEOS: 21.7 months (13.0, 29.7) (n=50/73)

7+3: 10.4 months (7.8, 15.2) (n=43/52)

Limitations of subanalysis

  • This exploratory post hoc subgroup analysis was not powered to determine statistical significance. No efficacy conclusions about OS can be drawn from this analysis
  • Results should be interpreted with caution, as this analysis was not prespecified and was conducted in a small, nonrandomized subgroup (n=125)2,4
  • The treatment effect of this nonrandomized subgroup was possibly confounded by unbalanced baseline characteristics
 

For sAML patients whose treatment goals align with transplant, start with VYXEOS2

The foundation of sAML treatment is chemotherapy, with the ultimate goal of achieving remission and reaching HSCT6-8,f

 

Exploratory post hoc analysis

Long-term OS in patients who received HSCT in the Phase 3 trial2

LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP

Analysis 1: Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival landmarked from time of HSCT2

OS from time of HSCT after treatment with VYXEOS

Median overall survival (95% CI):

VYXEOS: Not reached (16.2, NR) (n=23/53)9

7+3: 10.3 months (6.2, 16.7) (n=30/39)9

5-year KM estimates from date of HSCT were not available, as the follow-up time from date of HSCT was less than 5 years2

KM-estimated survival rates from date of randomization were higher for VYXEOS vs 7+3 at 3 and 5 years and was >50% at 5 years for patients treated with VYXEOS10,11

Limitations of subanalysis

  • This exploratory post hoc subgroup analysis was not powered to determine statistical significance. No efficacy conclusions about OS following HSCT can be drawn from this analysis
  • Results should be interpreted with caution, as this analysis was not prespecified and was conducted in a small, nonrandomized subgroup (n=92)2
  • The treatment effect of this nonrandomized subgroup was possibly confounded by unbalanced baseline characteristics
    • A higher proportion of patients proceeding to HSCT in the VYXEOS arm (75%) were in CR/CRi as compared with the 7+3 arm (62%)2
    • To address this limitation, Analysis 2 (right)(below) evaluated only those patients in each treatment arm who were in CR/CRi at the time they received HSCT4

Analysis 2: Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival landmarked from time of HSCT in patients who achieved CR or CRi4

OS in from time of HSCT in CR/CRi patients who received VYXEOS

Median overall survival (95% CI):

VYXEOS: Not reached (15.6, NR) (n=19/41)

7+3: 11.7 months (4.6, 24.3) (n=17/24)

5-year KM estimates from date of HSCT were not available, as the follow-up time from date of HSCT was less than 5 years2

Limitations of subanalysis

  • This exploratory post hoc subgroup analysis was not powered to determine statistical significance. No efficacy conclusions about OS following HSCT after CR or CRi can be drawn from this analysis
  • Results should be interpreted with caution, as this analysis was not prespecified and was conducted in a small, nonrandomized subgroup (n=65)2,4
  • The treatment effect of this nonrandomized subgroup was possibly confounded by unbalanced baseline characteristics
 

Exploratory post hoc analysis

Patients who achieved CR or CRi and did not undergo transplant in the Phase 3 trial12,g

Median OS for non-HSCT
patients who achieved CR12

non-HSCT CR

Median OS for non-HSCT
patients who achieved
CR+CRi12

non-HSCT CR+CRi

Limitations of subanalysis

  • This subgroup analysis was exploratory and not powered to determine statistical significance. No efficacy conclusions about OS following CR or CRi can be drawn from this analysis
  • Results should be interpreted with caution, as this analysis was not prespecified and was conducted in a small, nonrandomized subgroup (n=61)12
  • The treatment effect of this nonrandomized subgroup was possibly confounded by unbalanced baseline characteristics
 
 

Study Design1,2

The Phase 3 study was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled superiority study of VYXEOS (N=153) versus cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3; N=156) in patients 60 to 75 years of age with newly-diagnosed t-AML or AML-MRC (N=309). Efficacy was established on the basis of overall survival from the date of randomization to death from any cause.1

VYXEOS 44 mg/100 mg per m2 (daunorubicin/cytarabine) was given intravenously on Days 1, 3, and 5 for first induction and on Days 1 and 3 for those needing a second induction. For consolidation, the VYXEOS dose was 29 mg/65 mg per m2 (daunorubicin/cytarabine) on Days 1 and 3. In the 7+3 arm, first induction was cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day on Days 1-7 by continuous infusion + daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day on Days 1-3. For second induction and consolidation, cytarabine was dosed on Days 1-5 and daunorubicin on Days 1 and 2. Patients could receive up to 2 cycles of induction and 2 cycles of consolidation in each arm. Subsequent induction was highly recommended for patients who did not achieve a response and was mandatory for patients achieving >50% reduction in percent blasts.1

The prospectively planned overall survival analysis of the ITT population was conducted based on the final 5-year follow-up results from the Phase 3 trial. Exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses were also conducted.2

Learn more about the Phase 3 study design

INDICATION

VYXEOS is indicated for the treatment of newly-diagnosed therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t‑AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) in adults and pediatric patients 1 year and older.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

INDICATION

VYXEOS is indicated for the treatment of newly-diagnosed therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t‑AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) in adults and pediatric patients 1 year and older.

Important Safety Information

WARNING: DO NOT INTERCHANGE WITH OTHER DAUNORUBICIN AND/OR CYTARABINE-CONTAINING PRODUCTS

VYXEOS has different dosage recommendations than daunorubicin hydrochloride injection, cytarabine injection, daunorubicin citrate liposome injection, and cytarabine liposome injection. Verify drug name and dose prior to preparation and administration to avoid dosing errors.